flourocarbon for trolling
Pensacola Fishing Forum
Forum Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        



flourocarbon for trolling Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 3/14/2008 6:01:51 PM
Mingo

MingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingo

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:19:52 PM
Posts: 140, Visits: 4,788
i went to the saltwater sportsman seminar in mobile last saturday. when they were discussing offshore trolling, george poveromo and the other pros speaking were all about using fluorocarbon for bluewater trolling. using fluorocarbon for bottom bumping and tuna is one thing, but would it make a difference to use it for dolphin/wahoo/billfish trolling?
Post #78541
Posted 3/14/2008 6:12:43 PM


Mingo

MingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingo

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/14/2010 8:32:47 AM
Posts: 193, Visits: 7,202
I don't think that there would be much benefit over mono, unless you're into a bunch of spooky open water tuna. 
Post #78546
Posted 3/15/2008 6:03:03 AM


White Marlin

White MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite Marlin

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 3:55:38 PM
Posts: 2,688, Visits: 7,482
I agree; the only times I use flouro trolling is for tuna or slow trolling live hardtails around weedlines or rigs.

Post #78734
Posted 3/15/2008 12:08:36 PM
Mingo

MingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingo

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2/19/2010 8:13:47 PM
Posts: 108, Visits: 361
I think it depends on your outlook, look at it from a divers perspective. Ever taken a look at mono at depth, looks like a friggin rope danglin there. That orange high viz looks like police tape at a crack house it REALLY shows up under water. I could spot it 30 feet away in only 50 ft viz. I'm just sayin that if i could see it, i'm pretty sure they could see it. Whether or not it makes a dif using flouro... who knows but i'll try anything once
Post #78899
Posted 3/15/2008 5:51:16 PM


Sailfish

SailfishSailfishSailfishSailfishSailfishSailfishSailfishSailfish

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/18/2010 8:13:47 PM
Posts: 1,469, Visits: 5,147
No.  It's a waste of money for billfish.  They're big and mean and they're not afraid of a skinny piece of string.  Chunking or live bait fishing for tuna with light line, yes.  Billfish trolling plastic baits, NO.

Remember that those guys are being paid to sell products.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Post #79003
Posted 3/15/2008 6:11:14 PM


Mingo

MingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingo

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 5:54:59 PM
Posts: 196, Visits: 368
go with mono its WAY cheaper and you wont need the flourocarbon for big game trolling

--------------------------------------------------------------------

                          "I piss on Shimanos"

Post #79015
Posted 3/16/2008 4:34:22 PM
Mingo

MingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingo

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:19:52 PM
Posts: 140, Visits: 4,788
appreciate the feedback. i will be sticking with mono.
Post #79476
Posted 3/17/2008 6:11:15 AM


White Marlin

White MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite Marlin

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 3:55:38 PM
Posts: 2,688, Visits: 7,482
"Remember that those guys are being paid to sell products." -Xanadu

Who are those guys? I get paid to sell those products and I DON'T recommend using flouro for trolling. It is entirely to expensive to rig all of your trolling baits on flourocarbon especially when the stuff goes for about 70 bucks for 30 yds. of 150# seaguar. There are still guys who fish marlin with cable leaders. I don't think I would go that route, but it proves a hungry fish will eat if you feed him. I'll stick to my mono for trolling.

Post #79840
Posted 3/17/2008 4:35:01 PM


Sailfish

SailfishSailfishSailfishSailfishSailfishSailfishSailfishSailfish

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/18/2010 8:13:47 PM
Posts: 1,469, Visits: 5,147
tunapopper (3/17/2008)
"Remember that those guys are being paid to sell products." -Xanadu

Who are those guys? I get paid to sell those products and I DON'T recommend using flouro for trolling. It is entirely to expensive to rig all of your trolling baits on flourocarbon especially when the stuff goes for about 70 bucks for 30 yds. of 150# seaguar. There are still guys who fish marlin with cable leaders. I don't think I would go that route, but it proves a hungry fish will eat if you feed him. I'll stick to my mono for trolling.

 

Obviously you didn't read the OP.  George Povermo and any other "pro" recommending to the novice angler that they rig their trolling lures on Fluoro leaders.  That's who.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Post #80131
Posted 3/17/2008 7:03:28 PM


White Marlin

White MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite Marlin

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 3:55:38 PM
Posts: 2,688, Visits: 7,482
I gotcha, I can't say I agree with many of his tactics myself; of course like you say, the info. given is usually tainted with some form of advertisement garbage.

Post #80212
Posted 3/19/2008 6:08:16 PM


White Marlin

White MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite MarlinWhite Marlin

Group: Banned Members
Last Login: 3/12/2010 8:54:06 AM
Posts: 2,857, Visits: 6,436
this is one of those topics i am kinda "on the fence" on. some would say "if you have the money, then by all means, pay for flourocarbon;" others would say, that blue marlin are so damn angry and mean that they do not have a preference for leader material. all i can say is this, i do not rig my tuna leaders (15' for 130# flouro) with anything BUT flouro. and when grouper fishing (specifically targeting grouper with live baits or a bigass butterflied mackerel or the like). as for my billfish leaders though, momoi mono does just fine.

 

Team PrimeTime
Auburn Wakeboard Team

Post #81433
Posted 3/19/2008 10:04:23 PM


Grouper

GrouperGrouperGrouperGrouperGrouperGrouperGrouperGrouper

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:37:13 PM
Posts: 1,111, Visits: 7,925
I remember when flouro first started hitting the shelves and leaving the shelves at a phenominal rate when I worked at J&M.  But,we also remember the first unbiased article doing visual underwater tests by divers in 80' visability doing pass overs with different flouros' and monofilaments and the results showed flouro's being MORE visible than some mono's like jinkai and momoi.

  All you could say after reading such an article was damn, sucks for them(flouro guys).  But hell no, not even a decline in sales with the future dynasties. Articles and reports on flouro shortly after the unbiased article seemed so $ influenced claiming such a perfect product. It was funny but sickening at the same time. I still believe in that first report on the stuff and dont believe the product has went through some major change since that test. It is what it always was fluorocarbon.

_____________________________________________________________

    

Post #81622
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


All times are GMT -6:00, Time now is 4:41am

   Pensacola Fishing Fourm


This site is also available at:
http://www.fishinginflorida.info  http://www.fishinginalabama.info http://www.destinfishingforum.com
http://www.orangebeachfishingforum.com
  http://www.fishthebridge.com   http://www.pensacolahuntingforum.com  http://www.pensacoladivingforum.com